ArticleTurkish journal of urology2021
Survey on what COVID-19 pandemic changed in pediatric urology.
Article in Turkish journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to conduct a survey to see how the patient management of pediatric urologists has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in daily practice and its compliance with the guidelines that aim to minimize the harm to the patient and healthcare professionals. MATERIAL AND
methodsA questionnaire was prepared to be asked to physicians via Microsoft Forms dealing with pediatric urology for this purpose, and a link was shared in social media groups of doctors managing pediatric urology patients.
resultsA total of 58 (46 males and 12 females) doctors participated in the survey. Participants stated that they made a very high rate of change in their clinical routine; the most preferred approach for the prevention in the operating room was reducing the number of the working staff, and the second most frequent was performing a preoperative COVID-19 screening. Elective surgeries (ie, inguinoscrotal pathologies) were delayed by the majority. However, the majority of the surgeons did not delay surgeries for ureteropelvic junction obstruction or urinary stones. Ninety-five percent of the participants stated that the number of patients was decreased in the outpatient clinics, which was mainly due to the hospital and government policies. The most used method to communicate with patients during the pandemic was phone calls, and there was a 52% increase in the WhatsApp messenger application before the pandemic.
conclusionOur survey provided us with an opinion about how our colleagues' lives changed during the pandemic and showed us the importance of a well-established telemedicine system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.