Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118800›Full record

SynthesisActa ophthalmologica2022

Visual system and motor development in children: a systematic review.

María Carmen Sánchez-González, Rocío Palomo-Carrión, Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo, Rita Pilar Romero-Galisteo, Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Elena Pinero-Pinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta ophthalmologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María Carmen Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-8615
Rocío Palomo-CarriónDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4034-2585
Concepción De-Hita-CantalejoDepartment of Physics of Condensed Matter, Optics Area, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0382-2053
Rita Pilar Romero-GalisteoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Science Health, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-0679
Estanislao Gutiérrez-SánchezDepartment of Surgery, Ophthalmology Area, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4851-680X
Elena Pinero-PintoDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-3939
Universidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to review the available scientific literature on the possible relationship between the visual system and motor development in children.

methodsThis study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) statement recommendations. The review protocol is available in PROSPERO (CRD42021245341). Four different databases, namely Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science, were assessed from April 2005 to February 2021. To determine the quality of the articles, we used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Quality Appraisal Scale, and a protocol was followed to define the levels of evidence on the basis of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The search strategy included terms describing motor development in children and adolescents with visual disorders.

resultsAmong the identified studies, 23 were included in the study. All selected articles examined the relationship between the visual system and development in children. The quality of most of the studies was moderate-high, and they were between evidence levels 2 and 4.

conclusionsOur systematic review revealed that all included studies established a relationship between the visual system and development in children. However, the methods for measuring the visual system and motor skills lacked uniformity.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsAdolescentChildHumansVision, Ocularamblyopiachild developmentmotor skillsocular motility disordersvisual disorders

Identifiers

PMID35118800
PMCPMC9790241
OpenAlexW4210295351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.