Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118795›Full record

Trial reportEarly intervention in psychiatry2022

An online intervention for 18-25-year-old youth whose parents have a mental illness and/or substance use disorder: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Darryl Maybery, Andrea Reupert, Catherine Bartholomew, Rose Cuff, Zoe Duncan, Caitlin McAuliffe, Louise McLean, Laura Pettenuzzo, Alice Swing, Kim Foster

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Growing in the Shadow of Mental Illness: Quality of Life, Health Status, Social Functioning, and Health Care Utilization Among Adults to Parents With Severe Mental Illness.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Darryl MayberySchool of Rural Health, Monash University, Warragul, Australia, Australia.
Andrea ReupertSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1447-7769
Catherine BartholomewWellways Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rose CuffSatellite Foundation, North Melbourne, Australia.
Zoe DuncanSchool of Rural Health, Monash University, Warragul, Australia, Australia.
Caitlin McAuliffeSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Louise McLeanSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Laura PettenuzzoSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Alice SwingSchool of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Kim FosterNorth Western Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimYoung adults aged 18-25 whose parents have a mental illness or substance use problem can be vulnerable to multiple difficulties in adulthood. There are, however, few available interventions designed for this group. This study evaluated a 6 week online intervention (mi. spot; mental illness: supported, preventative, online, targeted) specifically designed for this population. The intervention aims to improve mental health and wellbeing.

methodsForty-one young people, recruited from the community, participated in a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial where participants were randomized to mi. spot (n = 22) or a wait list control group (n = 19). They were assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at six weeks post intervention with measures covering depression, anxiety and stress, wellbeing, coping, general self-efficacy, help seeking and social connectedness.

resultsIntervention participants reported significantly improved psychological wellbeing, coping, general self-efficacy, and a reduction in anxiety. Participants in the control group reported significant improvements in emotional wellbeing and help seeking and a reduction in self-blame.

conclusionThis pilot controlled trial supported previous findings and shows preliminary evidence that mi.spot is effective for young adults who grew up with parents who have a mental illness or substance use problem. A large-scale, randomized controlled trial with a diverse group of young people is needed.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionMental DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultHumansParentsPilot ProjectsYoung Adultearly interventionmental healthparental mental illnessyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID35118795
PMCPMC9790290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.