Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118680›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical virology2022

Third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A systematic review of 30 published studies.

Fausto Petrelli, Andrea Luciani, Karen Borgonovo, Mara Ghilardi, Maria Chiara Parati, Daniela Petrò, Veronica Lonati, Angelo Pesenti, Mary Cabiddu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fausto PetrelliMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-4486
Andrea LucianiMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Karen BorgonovoMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Mara GhilardiMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Maria Chiara ParatiMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Daniela PetròMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Veronica LonatiMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Angelo PesentiClinical Diagnostics Department, Laboratory Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.
Mary CabidduMedical Sciences Department, Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed published studies on the efficacy and safety of the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in various general population settings. We conducted systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE for series published in the English language through November 15, 2021, using the search terms "third" or "booster" or "three" and "dose" and "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2." All articles were selected according to the MOOSE guidelines. The seroconversion risk after third doses was descriptively expressed as a pooled rate ratio ([seroconversion rate after the third dose]/[seroconversion rate after the second dose]). The search returned 30 studies that included a total of 2 734 437 vaccinated subjects. In more than 2 700 000 Israeli patients extracted from the general population, the reduction in the risk of infection ranged from 88% to 92%. Conversion rates for IgG anti-spike ranged from 95% to 100%. In cancer or immunocompromised patients, mean IgG seroconversion was 39.4% before and 66.6% after third doses. A third dose seems necessary to protect against all COVID-19 infection, severe disease, and death risk.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAntibodies, ViralHumansImmunoglobulin GSARS-CoV-2SeroconversionAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GboosterCOVID-19third dosevaccination

Identifiers

PMID35118680
PMCPMC9015523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.