Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118640›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Acute ischemic stroke in a university hospital intensive care unit: 1-year costs and outcome.

Simon Kortelainen, Sami Curtze, Nicolas Martinez-Majander, Rahul Raj, Markus B Skrifvars

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon KortelainenDepartment of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-4380
Sami CurtzeDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-8500
Nicolas Martinez-MajanderDepartment of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8489-7051
Rahul RajDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-9591
Markus B SkrifvarsDepartment of Emergency Care and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-0262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLittle is currently known about the cost-effectiveness of intensive care of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We evaluated 1-year costs and outcome for patients with AIS treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-center retrospective study of patients admitted to an academic ICU with AIS between 2003 and 2013. True healthcare expenditure was obtained up to 1 year after admission and adjusted to consumer price index of 2019. Patient outcome was 12-month functional outcome and mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of favorable outcomes and linear regression analysis to assess factors associated with costs. We calculated the effective cost per survivor (ECPS) and effective cost per favorable outcome (ECPFO).

resultsThe study population comprised 154 patients. Reasons for ICU admission were: decreased consciousness level (47%) and need for respiratory support (40%). There were 68 (44%) 1 year survivors, of which 27 (18%) had a favorable outcome. High age (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-0.98) and high hospital admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97) were independent predictors of poor outcomes. Increased age had a cost ratio of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99) per added year. The ECPS and ECPFO were 115,628€ and 291,210€, respectively.

conclusionsTreatment of AIS in the ICU is resource-intense, and in an era predating mechanical thrombectomy the outcome is often poor, suggesting a need for further research into cost-efficacy of ICU care for AIS patients.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeCritical CareHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective Studiesacute ischemic strokecost-efficacycost of careintensive care

Identifiers

PMID35118640
PMCPMC9304289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.