Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118608›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Clinical and Demographic Differences Among Cancer Survivors With Ostomies With and Without Informal Caregivers.

Matthew Rock, Jake M Kieserman, Virginia Sun, Marcia Grant, Elizabeth Ercolano, Ruth McCorkle, Michael J Holcomb, Ronald S Weinstein, Mark C Hornbrook, Robert S Krouse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of ostomy on colorectal cancer patients and caregivers: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew RockPerelman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-8700
Jake M KiesermanPerelman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Virginia SunDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Marcia GrantDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Elizabeth ErcolanoSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ruth McCorkleSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael J HolcombArizona Telemedicine Program, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ronald S WeinsteinArizona Telemedicine Program, The University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Mark C HornbrookKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Robert S KrousePerelman School of Medicine Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania and and Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Robert.Krouse@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 1507-31690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informal caregivers have an essential role for cancer survivors (CS). There may be important clinical and demographic differences between CS with ostomies based on caregiver status. Our aim was to identify items that may lead to future recommendations and interventions for CS with ostomies. This is a secondary analysis of 216 CS with ostomies that were enrolled in a clinical trial. Baseline data collected included demographics, clinical characteristics, and surveys (patient activation, self-efficacy, City of Hope Quality of Life - Ostomy). These factors were compared based on caregiver status using chi-squared analysis and t-tests. Logistic regression was used to examine the factors that affect the likelihood of having a caregiver. Most participants had an identified caregiver (57%; 124/216). There was no difference in age based on caregiver status (mean 64.4 and 62.0 for those with and without a caregiver, respectively). Of those with a caregiver, 66.9% were males, 79.0% were partnered, and 87.1% were white. Those with caregivers had a higher prevalence of diabetes (p < 0.001), heart disease (p = 0.002), and mobility issues (p = 0.002). Survivors with caregivers had both higher incomes (p = 0.012) and levels of education (p = 0.049). The only difference in survey measures was those with a caregiver were more successful at getting help when needed (p = .045). Differences in gender and comorbidities of CS with caregivers demand further investigation. Interventions such as encouraging CS without caregivers to utilize available sources of social support, including other survivors with ostomies, may improve their care and quality of life.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsOstomyCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurvivorsCancer survivorsCaregiversInterventionOstomyPsycho-oncologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.