ArticleBrain structure & function2022
Mechanism underpinning the sharpening of orientation and spatial frequency selectivities in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) primary visual cortex.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Understanding structure-function relationships in the mammalian visual system: part two.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of mammals show sharp orientation selectivity and band-pass spatial frequency tuning. Here, we examine whether sharpening of the broad tuning that exists subcortically, namely in the retina and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), underlie the sharper tuning seen for both the above features in tree shrew V1. Since the transition from poor feature selectivity to sharp tuning occurs entirely within V1 in tree shrews, we examined the orientation selectivity and spatial frequency tuning of neurons within individual electrode penetrations. We found that most layer 4 and layer 2/3 neurons in the same cortical column preferred the same stimulus orientation. However, a subset of layer 3c neurons close to the layer 4 border preferred near orthogonal orientations, suggesting that layer 2/3 neurons may inherit the orientation preferences of their layer 4 input neurons and also receive cross-orientation inhibition from layer 3c neurons. We also found that layer 4 neurons showed sharper orientation selectivity at higher spatial frequencies, suggesting that attenuation of low spatial frequency responses by spatially broad inhibition acting on layer 4 inputs to layer 2/3 neurons can enhance both orientation and spatial frequency selectivities. However, in a proportion of layer 2/3 neurons, the sharper tuning of layer 2/3 neurons appeared to arise also or even mainly from inhibition specific to high spatial frequencies acting on the layer 4 inputs to layer 2/3. Overall, our results are consistent with the suggestion that in tree shrews, sharp feature selectivity in layer 2/3 can be established by intracortical mechanisms that sharpen biases observed in layer 4, which are in turn inherited presumably from thalamic afferents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35118562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.