ReviewHeart failure reviews2022
Evaluation of donor heart for transplantation.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing recovery of marginal donor hearts with low ejection fraction: A national retrospective study from Switzerland.JHLT open · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of echocardiographic data for heart transplant eligibility in brain death cases.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Heart donation after a fatal stab wound to the right ventricle: a case report.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- Outcomes of donation after brain death heart transplantation from older donors: A contemporary analysis of the UNOS database.JHLT open · 2025Article
- Kinetics of Procalcitonin, CRP, IL-6, and Presepsin in Heart Transplant Patients Undergoing Induction with Thymoglobulin (rATG).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A soft robotic total artificial hybrid heart.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Selective Angiography of Stimulant-Exposed Cardiac Donors Following Circulatory Death Does Not Impact Post-Transplant Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Improving the Prioritization of Heart Transplantation Candidates for Optimal Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Coronary computed tomographic angiographic imaging of cardiac allograft preserved in Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System.JHLT open · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of preoperative nutritional status for heart transplantation patients.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Novel para-aortic cardiac assistance using a pre-stretched dielectric elastomer actuator.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Heart Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Novel portable hypothermic machine perfusion preservation device enhances cardiac viability of donated human hearts.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Elevated serum albumin-to-creatinine ratio as a protective factor on outcomes after heart transplantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac transplantation is considered the gold-standard treatment option for patients suffering from end-stage heart failure refractory to maximum medical therapy. A major determinant of graft function and recipient survival is a comprehensive evaluation of the donor allograft. Challenges arise when designing and implementing an evidence-based donor evaluation protocol due to the number of influential donor-specific characteristics and the complex interactions that occur between them. Here, we present our systematic approach to donor evaluation by examining the impact that relevant donor variables have on graft function and recipient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.