Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118441›Full record

ReviewTouchREVIEWS in endocrinology2021

The DFUC 2020 Dataset: Analysis Towards Diabetic Foot Ulcer Detection.

Bill Cassidy, Neil D Reeves, Joseph M Pappachan, David Gillespie, Claire O'Shea, Satyan Rajbhandari, Arun G Maiya, Eibe Frank, Andrew Jm Boulton, David G Armstrong and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Artificial Intelligence to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Bill CassidyCentre for Applied Computational Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Neil D ReevesResearch Centre for Musculoskeletal Science & Sports Medicine, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Joseph M PappachanResearch Centre for Musculoskeletal Science & Sports Medicine, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
David GillespieCentre for Applied Computational Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Claire O'SheaWaikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Satyan RajbhandariLancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK.
Arun G MaiyaManipal College of Health Professions, Karnataka, India.
Eibe FrankDepartment of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Andrew Jm BoultonSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David G ArmstrongKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bijan NajafiBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA.
Justina WuWaikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Rupinder Singh KochharLancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK.
Moi Hoon YapCentre for Applied Computational Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Improving the science of adherence reinforcement and safe mobility in people with diabetic foot ulcers using smart offloadingR01DK124789 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARMSTRONG, DAVID GEORGE, NAJAFI, BIJAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every 20 seconds a limb is amputated somewhere in the world due to diabetes. This is a global health problem that requires a global solution. The International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention challenge, which concerns the automated detection of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) using machine learning techniques, will accelerate the development of innovative healthcare technology to address this unmet medical need. In an effort to improve patient care and reduce the strain on healthcare systems, recent research has focused on the creation of cloud-based detection algorithms. These can be consumed as a service by a mobile app that patients (or a carer, partner or family member) could use themselves at home to monitor their condition and to detect the appearance of a DFU. Collaborative work between Manchester Metropolitan University, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals and the Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust has created a repository of 4,000 DFU images for the purpose of supporting research toward more advanced methods of DFU detection. This paper presents a dataset description and analysis, assessment methods, benchmark algorithms and initial evaluation results. It facilitates the challenge by providing useful insights into state-of-the-art and ongoing research.

Indexed as

deep learningDFU datasetDiabetic footmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID35118441
PMCPMC8320006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.