Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118364›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Imaging somatosensory cortex responses measured by OPM-MEG: Variational free energy-based spatial smoothing estimation approach.

Nan An, Fuzhi Cao, Wen Li, Wenli Wang, Weinan Xu, Chunhui Wang, Min Xiang, Yang Gao, Binbin Sui, Aimin Liang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fe-Based Nanocrystalline Magnetic Shielding Cylinder with Subfemtotesla-Level Magnetic Noise.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. OMMR: Co-registration toolbox of OPM-MEG and MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nan AnSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Fuzhi CaoSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Wen LiSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Wenli WangSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Weinan XuSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Chunhui WangSchool of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Min XiangResearch Institute of Frontier Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yang GaoHangzhou Innovation Institute, Beihang University, Hangzhou 100191, China.
Binbin SuiBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China.
Aimin LiangBeijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100045, China.
Xiaolin NingResearch Institute of Frontier Science, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, optically pumped magnetometer (OPM)-based magnetoencephalography (MEG) has shown potential for analyzing brain activity. It has a flexible sensor configuration and comparable sensitivity to conventional SQUID-MEG. We constructed a 32-channel OPM-MEG system and used it to measure cortical responses to median and ulnar nerve stimulations. Traditional magnetic source imaging methods tend to blur the spatial extent of sources. Accurate estimation of the spatial size of the source is important for studying the organization of brain somatotopy and for pre-surgical functional mapping. We proposed a new method called variational free energy-based spatial smoothing estimation (FESSE) to enhance the accuracy of mapping somatosensory cortex responses. A series of computer simulations based on the OPM-MEG showed better performance than the three types of competing methods under different levels of signal-to-noise ratios, source patch sizes, and co-registration errors. FESSE was then applied to the source imaging of the OPM-MEG experimental data.

Indexed as

MagnetoencephalographyMedicineNeuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35118364
PMCPMC8800110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.