Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118225›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology2022

Do Low-Risk Patients With Dyspepsia Need a Gastroscopy? Use of Gastroscopy for Otherwise Healthy Patients With Dyspepsia.

Jennifer B Halasz, Kelly W Burak, Shawn K Dowling, Brenna Murray, Jennifer Williams, Tarun Misra, Sander J Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Gilaad G Kaplan, Mark Swain, Kerri L Novak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Up-Front Endoscopy Maximizes Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Satisfaction in Uninvestigated Dyspepsia.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer B HalaszDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Kelly W BurakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Shawn K DowlingPhysician Learning Program, Continuing Medical Education and Professional Development, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brenna MurrayPhysician Learning Program, Continuing Medical Education and Professional Development, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tarun MisraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sander J Veldhuyzen van ZantenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Gilaad G KaplanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-0556
Mark SwainDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kerri L NovakDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChoosing Wisely Canada (CWC) recommends not to perform gastroscopy for dyspepsia in otherwise healthy adults less than 55 years of age (2014). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of gastroscopy in a young, healthy population with uncomplicated dyspepsia.

methodsA retrospective review of gastroscopies completed during 3-month periods in 2015, 2016, and 2017 identified all patients undergoing gastroscopy for the primary indication of dyspepsia. Low-risk patients for dyspepsia were defined as adults, aged 18 to 54 years without alarm symptoms, comorbidities and/or abnormal imaging findings or laboratory values. Gastroscopy and pathology reports were reviewed to identify clinically actionable findings. Clinical outcomes were followed to December 31, 2018 including gastroenterology referrals, emergency room visitation and hospitalization.

resultsAmong 1358 patients having a gastroscopy for dyspepsia, 480 (35%) were low-risk patients. Sixteen patients 3.3% (16/480) had a clinically actionable result found on gastroscopy or biopsy. No malignant lesions were detected. Low-risk patients were followed up for an average of 2.75 years, 8% (39/480) visited the emergency department (ED), 1% (3/480) of patients were admitted to hospital and 12% (59/480) of patients were re-referred for a dyspepsia-related concern.

interpretationA high rate of low yield, high cost, invasive endoscopic investigations were performed in this population of otherwise healthy patients under age 55 years. These data suggest limited uptake of current recommendations against the routine use of gastroscopy to investigate dyspepsia.

Indexed as

Choosing WiselyDyspepsiaGastroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35118225
PMCPMC8806042
OpenAlexW3179014645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.