Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118205›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

A review of clustering techniques for waste management.

Fernanda Medeiros Assef, Maria Teresinha Arns Steiner, Edson Pinheiro de Lima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernanda Medeiros AssefIndustrial and Systems Engineering Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Teresinha Arns SteinerIndustrial and Systems Engineering Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Edson Pinheiro de LimaIndustrial and Systems Engineering Program, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of problems related to waste management systems can be found in the literature, as they have become tougher to solve over the years. With this in mind, a report of the most influential research concerns in this field could help develop innovative works for solving waste management applications. Literature reviews appear in most introductions and discussion sections of research reports, case reports, and expert opinion papers. It was immediately observed that Cluster Analysis, a multivariate data mining technique, has been used in various applications for sustainability issues. For this reason, this paper shows the results of a Systematic Literature Review on Cluster Analysis techniques applied to waste management. This paper's primary goal is to detect what is happening with the applications and techniques in clustering techniques for waste management and, in this way, define possible gaps in this research field. The 61 analyzed papers were categorized into nine application types within the field of waste management (logistics/business; landfill research; theoretical/consequential; waste collection problems; location/selection; monitoring/decision support systems; leachate/water contamination; waste incineration/energy production and, waste forecast/waste production behavior). Following an analysis of their content, gaps were found related to exploring the complex situations in each problem. Instead of using general rules and constraints for their methodologies to solve real-world problems, they resorted to theoretical orientation solutions. Furthermore, suggestions from specialists in the field and more fitting constraints related to the data evaluated could make the works seem less theoretical and more visually applicable.

Indexed as

Landfill locationSystematic literature reviewWaste collectionWaste management

Identifiers

PMID35118205
PMCPMC8792088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.