ReviewFrontiers in sociology2021
Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia.
Review in Frontiers in sociology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gap of women leadership in global obesity research.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Article
- Wellness in the invisible workforce: a pilot well-being study in black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) women faculty in the pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Identifying the 50 most productive researchers in top-tier, broad-scope educational psychology journals (2017-2022): a new perspective with a focus on publication trends and diversity.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Will they always be living the Sisyphus punishment? The triple whammy for racialized women: a qualitative investigation of primary care researchers in Canada.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Escaping the midway trap: A mixed method study highlighting roadblocks and coping mechanisms of female researchers in Cameroon.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Stochastic modelling of intersectional pay gaps in universities.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- The Social Science of Institutional Transformation: Intersectional Change in the Academy.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Article
- Supporting women's research in predominantly undergraduate institutions: Experiences with a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Award.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From its earliest beginnings, the university was not designed for women, and certainly not for women of color. Women of color in the United States are disproportionately under-represented in academia and are conspicuous by their absence across disciplines at senior ranks, particularly at research-intensive universities. This absence has an epistemic impact and affects future generations of scholars who do not see themselves represented in the academy. What are the barriers to attracting, advancing, and retaining women faculty of color in academia? To address this question we review empirical studies that document disparities in the assessment of research, teaching, and service in academia that have distinct implications for the hiring, promotion, and professional visibility of women of color. We argue that meaningful change in the representation, equity, and prestige of women faculty of color will require validating their experiences, supporting and valuing their research, creating opportunities for their professional recognition and advancement, and implementing corrective action for unjust assessment practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.