Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Development and Validation of a Personalized Prognostic Prediction Model for Patients With Spinal Cord Astrocytoma.

Sheng Yang, Xun Yang, Huiwen Wang, Yuelin Gu, Jingjing Feng, Xianfeng Qin, Chaobo Feng, Yufeng Li, Lijun Liu, Guoxin Fan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Astrocytomas of the spinal cord.Neuro-oncology advances · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sheng YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xun YangDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huiwen WangShanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuelin GuKey Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
Jingjing FengThe First Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xianfeng QinCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Guangxi University for Nationalities, Nanning, China.
Chaobo FengDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yufeng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Lijun LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Guoxin FanNational Key Clinical Pain Medicine of China, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang LiaoNational Key Clinical Pain Medicine of China, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shisheng HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of spinal cord astrocytoma (SCA) and establish a nomogram prognostic model for the management of patients with SCA.

methodsPatients diagnosed with SCA between 1975 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training and testing datasets (7:3). The primary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox hazard proportional regression model was used to identify the prognostic factors of patients with SCA in the training dataset and feature importance was obtained. Based on the independent prognostic factors, nomograms were established for prognostic prediction. Calibration curves, concordance index (C-index), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the calibration and discrimination of the nomogram model, while Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and decision curve analyses (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical utility. Web-based online calculators were further developed to achieve clinical practicability.

resultsA total of 818 patients with SCA were included in this study, with an average age of 30.84 ± 21.97 years and an average follow-up time of 117.57 ± 113.51 months. Cox regression indicated that primary site surgery, age, insurance, histologic type, tumor extension, WHO grade, chemotherapy, and post-operation radiotherapy (PRT) were independent prognostic factors for OS. While primary site surgery, insurance, tumor extension, PRT, histologic type, WHO grade, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for CSS. For OS prediction, the calibration curves in the training and testing dataset illustrated good calibration, with C-indexes of 0.783 and 0.769. The area under the curves (AUCs) of 5-year survival prediction were 0.82 and 0.843, while 10-year survival predictions were 0.849 and 0.881, for training and testing datasets, respectively. Moreover, the DCA demonstrated good clinical net benefit. The prediction performances of nomograms were verified to be superior to that of single indicators, and the prediction performance of nomograms for CSS is also excellent.

conclusionsNomograms for patients with SCA prognosis prediction demonstrated good calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility. This result might benefit clinical decision-making and patient management for SCA. Before further use, more extensive external validation is required for the established web-based online calculators.

Indexed as

astrocytomanomogramprognostic factorSEERspinal tumorsurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID35118095
PMCPMC8804494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.