Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Deep Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Posttransplant Renal Function in Deceased-Donor Kidney Recipients: A Preliminary Study Based on Pretransplant Biopsy.

You Luo, Jing Liang, Xiao Hu, Zuofu Tang, Jinhua Zhang, Lanqing Han, Zhanwen Dong, Weiming Deng, Bin Miao, Yong Ren and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic significance of early cortical functional integrity measured byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

You LuoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing LiangDepartment of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao HuDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zuofu TangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinhua ZhangDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lanqing HanArtificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou, China.
Zhanwen DongDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming DengDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin MiaoDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yong RenArtificial Intelligence Innovation Center, Research Institute of Tsinghua, Pearl River Delta, Guangzhou, China.
Ning NaDepartment of Kidney Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNPearl River Hydraulic Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosttransplant renal function is critically important for kidney transplant recipients. Accurate prediction of graft function would greatly help in deciding acceptance or discard of allocated kidneys.

methods

resultsIn total, 219 recipients with H&E-stained slides of the donor kidneys were included for analysis [biopsies from standard criteria donor (SCD)/expanded criteria donor (ECD) was 191/28]. The results showed distinct improvements in the prediction performance of the deep learning algorithm plus the clinical characteristics model. The EfficientNet-B5 plus clinical data model showed the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). Compared with the clinical data model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the clinical data plus image model for eGFR classification increased from 0.69 to 0.83. In addition, the predictive performance for RGF increased from 0.66 to 0.80. Gradient-weighted class activation mappings (Grad-CAMs) showed that the models localized the areas of the tubules and interstitium near the glomeruli, which were discriminative features for RGF.

conclusionOur results preliminarily show that deep learning for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded H&E-stained WSIs improves graft function prediction accuracy for deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients.

Indexed as

deceased donordeep learninggraft functionkidney transplantationwhole slide digital image

Identifiers

PMID35118080
PMCPMC8804205
OpenAlexW4206824493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.