Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35118047›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to COVID-19 at Country Level.

Gina Samaan, Michelle McPherson, Johan Eidman, Offeibea Obubah, Jean-Pierre Baptiste, Lianne Kuppens, Kai Von Harbou, Miftahul Fahmi Sembiring, Shambhu Acharya, Peter Graaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gina SamaanHealth Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michelle McPhersonDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johan EidmanHealth Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Offeibea ObubahDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Pierre BaptisteWorld Health Organization, Bamako, Mali.
Lianne KuppensWorld Health Organization, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Kai Von HarbouWorld Health Organization, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
Miftahul Fahmi SembiringWorld Health Organization, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
Shambhu AcharyaDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Peter GraaffHealth Emergencies Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic highlighted that managing health emergencies requires more than an effective health response, but that operationalizing a whole-of-society approach is challenging. The World Health Organization (WHO), as the lead agency for health within the United Nations (UN), led the UN response at the global level through the Crisis Management Team, and at the country level through the UN Country Teams (UNCTs) in accordance with its mandate. Three case studies-Mali, Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and Uzbekistan-provide examples of how WHO contributed to the whole-of-society response for COVID-19 at the country level. Interviews with WHO staff, supplemented by internal and external published reports, highlighted that the action of WHO comprised technical expertise to ensure an effective whole-of-society response and to minimize social disruption, including those affecting peacekeeping in Mali, livelihood sectors in Cox's Bazar, and the education sector in Uzbekistan. Leveraging local level volunteers from various sectors led to both a stronger public health response and the continuation of other sectoral work. Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) emerged as a key theme for UN engagement at country level. These collective efforts of operationalizing whole-of-society response at the country level need to continue for the COVID-19 response, but also in preparedness for other health and non-health emergencies. Building resilience for future emergencies requires developing and exercising multi-sectoral preparedness plans and benefits from collective UN support to countries. Coronavirus disease had many impacts outside of health, and therefore emergency preparedness needs to occur outside of health too.

Indexed as

COVID-19Global HealthHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2World Health OrganizationcountryCOVID-19pandemicresponseUnited Nationswhole-of-societyWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID35118047
PMCPMC8804283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.