Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35117973›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of virology2022

Repurposing the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent N-acetyl cysteine for treating COVID-19.

Josef Finsterer, Fulvio A Scorza, Carla A Scorza, Ana C Fiorini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Josef FinstererNeurological Department, Messerli Institute, Vienna 1180, Austria. fifigs1@yahoo.de.
Fulvio A ScorzaDepartment of Neurology, University of Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo 01000-000, Brazil.
Carla A ScorzaDepartment of Neurology, University of Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo 01000-000, Brazil.
Ana C FioriniDepartment of Neurology, University of Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo 01000-000, Brazil.
AOL (United States) · USTU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several considerations have been raised suggesting a beneficial effect of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, there is currently no clinical evidence that NAC truly prevents coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), reduces the severity of the disease, or improves the outcome. Appropriately designed clinical trials are warranted to prove or disprove a therapeutic effect of NAC for COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19CytokinesN-acetyl cysteineReactive oxygen speciesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35117973
PMCPMC8788215
OpenAlexW4206309753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.