ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
A randomized controlled trial of Chinese traditional medicine Dachengqi Decoction in the treatment of postoperative intestinal function recovery.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best evidence summary of non-pharmacological interventions for postoperative abdominal distension in gynecological laparoscopic.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of multimodal rehabilitation strategies on gastrointestinal function recovery in postoperative aortic dissection patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntestinal dysfunction is not conducive to the recovery of patients after surgery. It is particularly important to restore the intestinal function as soon as possible. In recent years, ultrasonic drug penetration therapy as a new type of non-invasive therapy has been used to solve this problem, but its efficacy has not been confirmed.
methodsSingle-centre, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial in China that included 184 patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Ninety-one participants were randomly assigned to low-frequency ultrasound and electric pulses for transdermal drug delivery with Dachengqi Decoction (DCQD) (intervention group), and 90 were assigned to the control group after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. The primary outcome was time to first flatus after surgery (by patient's subjective feeling). Secondary outcomes assessed the recovery time of bowel movement, time of the first defecation, postoperative gastrointestinal complications (e.g., nausea, vomit, and bloating), days of hospitalization and treatment costs.
resultsOf 184 patients, 181 (98.4%) completed the trial. The sociodemographic characteristics and efficiency data were comparable in the two groups at baseline. The intervention group had a shorter mean time of bowel movement recovery than the control group [29.4 h (IQR, 22.0-35.0 h)
conclusionsLow-frequency ultrasound and electric pulses for transdermal drug delivery with DCQD can shorten the time of bowel movement recovery and accelerate first anal exhaust after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17013630.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.