ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Clinical and prognostic significance of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-monocyte ratio on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- A senescence-based machine learning model prognosticates and personalizes therapy in cervical cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Immune cell changes following chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer with variations based on gender.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Inflammatory Biomarkers from Blood Counts as Prognostic Tools in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients underwent esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Impact of postoperative lymph node status on the prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Quantitative immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of biomarker combinations for human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe interaction between tumor cells and inflammatory cells has not been systematically investigated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) could predict the prognosis of ESCC patients undergoing esophagectomy.
methodsA total of 1,883 patients with histologically diagnosed ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy from May 2005 to May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Besides clinicopathological factors, "Survminer" package in R
resultsThe median follow-up was 28.77 months (range, 1.60-247.90 months). The optimal cut-off point of LMR, NLR and NMR is 3.83, 2.06 and 7.21, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with low preoperative LMR demonstrated a significant worse prognosis for 5-year OS (P<0.001) than those with high preoperative LMR. The high NLR cohort had lower 5-year OS (P<0.001). No significant difference with 5-year OS was found in NMR (P=0.405). On multivariate analysis, preoperative LMR (P=0.018; HR =0.786, 95% CI: 0.645, 0.959) and NLR (P=0.028; HR =1.247, 95% CI: 1.024, 1.519) were the independent prognostic factors in ESCC patients. Integrating LMR and NLR, we divided the ESCC patients in four groups according to their cut-off points and we found the patients in LMR ≥3.83 and NLR <2.06 group received the best prognosis while the prognosis of patients in LMR<3.83 and NLR ≥2.06 group was the worst. The difference was statistically significant.
conclusionsPreoperative LMR and NLR better predicts cancer survival in patients with ESCC undergoing esophagectomy, especially under the circumstances of LMR ≥3.83 and NLR <2.06.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.