Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35117757›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2020

Clinical and prognostic significance of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-monocyte ratio on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Qi-Xin Shang, Yu-Shang Yang, Wei-Peng Hu, Yong Yuan, Yan He, Jing-Ying Zhao, Ai-Fang Ji, Long-Qi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inflammatory Biomarkers from Blood Counts as Prognostic Tools in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qi-Xin Shang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu-Shang Yang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei-Peng HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yan HeCentral Laboratory, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical University, Changzhi City, China.
Jing-Ying ZhaoCentral Laboratory, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical University, Changzhi City, China.
Ai-Fang JiCentral Laboratory, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical University, Changzhi City, China.
Long-Qi ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interaction between tumor cells and inflammatory cells has not been systematically investigated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR) could predict the prognosis of ESCC patients undergoing esophagectomy.

methodsA total of 1,883 patients with histologically diagnosed ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy from May 2005 to May 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Besides clinicopathological factors, "Survminer" package in R

resultsThe median follow-up was 28.77 months (range, 1.60-247.90 months). The optimal cut-off point of LMR, NLR and NMR is 3.83, 2.06 and 7.21, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients with low preoperative LMR demonstrated a significant worse prognosis for 5-year OS (P<0.001) than those with high preoperative LMR. The high NLR cohort had lower 5-year OS (P<0.001). No significant difference with 5-year OS was found in NMR (P=0.405). On multivariate analysis, preoperative LMR (P=0.018; HR =0.786, 95% CI: 0.645, 0.959) and NLR (P=0.028; HR =1.247, 95% CI: 1.024, 1.519) were the independent prognostic factors in ESCC patients. Integrating LMR and NLR, we divided the ESCC patients in four groups according to their cut-off points and we found the patients in LMR ≥3.83 and NLR <2.06 group received the best prognosis while the prognosis of patients in LMR<3.83 and NLR ≥2.06 group was the worst. The difference was statistically significant.

conclusionsPreoperative LMR and NLR better predicts cancer survival in patients with ESCC undergoing esophagectomy, especially under the circumstances of LMR ≥3.83 and NLR <2.06.

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR)neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR)prognosis

Identifiers

PMID35117757
PMCPMC8797393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.