ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Drug-eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with or without iodine-125 treatment is effective and tolerable in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a pilot study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chinese herbal medicine improves the treating outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy: a 5-year follow-up study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Recent progress in radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Clinical outcomes of vinorelbine loading CalliSpheres beads in the treatment of previously treated advanced lung cancer with progressive refractory obstructive atelectasis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Image-Guided Percutaneous and Transarterial Therapies for Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with or without iodine-125 (
methodsA total of 25 advanced NSCLC patients underwent DEB-TACE were consecutively enrolled, among which 17 cases also received
resultsZero (0.0%), 13 (54.2%), 9 (37.5%) and 2 (8.3%) patients realized complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progression disease (PD) respectively, and the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 54.2% and 91.7%. The median OS was 12.6 (95% CI: 7.8-17.5) months. No difference of treatment response or OS was observed between DEB-TACE treatment alone and DEB-TACE plus
conclusionsDEB-TACE with or without
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.