Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35117653›Full record

ReviewTranslational cancer research2020

Predicting response to radiotherapy in tumors with PET/CT: when and how?

Li-Fang Shen, Shui-Hong Zhou, Qi Yu

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pepsin enhances glycolysis to promote malignant transformation of vocal fold leukoplakia epithelial cells with dysplasia.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Fang ShenDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Shui-Hong ZhouDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Qi YuDepartment of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy is one of the main methods for tumor treatment, with the improved radiotherapy delivery technique to combat cancer, there is a growing interest for finding effective and feasible ways to predict tumor radiosensitivity. Based on a series of changes in metabolism, microvessel density, hypoxic microenvironment, and cytokines of tumors after radiotherapy, a variety of radiosensitivity detection methods have been studied. Among the detection methods, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) is a feasible tool for response evaluation following definitive radiotherapy for cancers with a high negative predictive value. The prognostic or predictive value of PET/CT is currently being studied widely. However, there are many unresolved issues, such as the optimal probe of PET/CT for radiosensitivity prediction, the selection of the most useful PET/CT parameters and their optimal cut-offs such as total lesion glycolysis (TLG), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and standardized uptake value (SUV), and the optimal timing of PET/CT pre-treatment, during or following RT. Different radiosensitivity of tumors, modes of radiotherapy action and fraction scheduling may complicate the appropriate choice. In this study, we will discuss the diverse methods for evaluating radiosensitivity, and will also focus on the selection of the optimal probe, timing, cut-offs and parameters of PET/CT for evaluating the radiotherapy response.

Indexed as

optimal cut-offsPET/CT parameterspositron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT)Radiosensitivitytextural features

Identifiers

PMID35117653
PMCPMC8798842
OpenAlexW3010886264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.