ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Three-dimensional reconstruction facilitates off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for stage cT1b renal tumors.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-Dimensional Printing Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy vs. Conventional Nephrectomy in Patients With Complex Renal Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Finite Element Analysis of Femoral-Acetabular Impingement (FAI) Based on Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the role of three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of T1b renal tumors in the off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).
methodsA total of 40 consecutive patients undergoing LPN for stage cT1b renal tumor between January 2018 and July 2018 were included. Twenty received off-clamp LPN under the guidance of 3D reconstruction (3D group), and remaining 20 underwent off-clamp LPN under the guidance of conventional computer tomography arteriography (CTA group). The demographics, perioperative characteristics and renal function were compared between groups.
resultsAll the procedures were performed successfully without conversion to main renal artery clamping. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, and RENAL score between two groups. The mean operation time (OT) was significantly shorter and estimated blood loss markedly less in the 3D group than in the CTA group. Incidence of postoperative complications was 5% in the 3D group and 10% in the CTA group (P>0.05). 3D reconstruction of renal tumors resulted in more accurate dissection of the tumor artery (90.9%) as compared to conventional CTA (81.5%). All the patients had negative surgical margins. There was no significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after surgery between two groups.
conclusions3D reconstruction is beneficial for the resection of cT1b renal tumor and tumor-specific feeding arteries in the off-clamp LPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.