ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Identification of lapatinib sensitivity-related genes by integrative functional module analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally, gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most commonly encountered malignancies and is the second highest contributor to cancer mortality. Lapatinib is a potent, orally-bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinases, and is administered to treat GC. However, a large proportion of patients either develop resistance to or do not respond to lapatinib, often because the treatment activates alternative signaling pathways. It is, therefore, vital to identify the key pathways which mediate resistance to lapatinib treatment.
methodsThe lapatinib sensitivity-related genes were extracted from the CellMiner database (version 2.2) using "NCI-60 Analysis Tools". The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in gastric cancer were derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was derived from the Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD), and the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) facilitated the functional analysis. The cell function was tested by CCK-8 cell viability assay, colony formation assay, acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining, and Transwell assay.
resultsThe functional linkage networks of lapatinib sensitivity were constructed. Two modules were identified, and pathway analysis indicated that these modules were involved in several pathways, including the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction network and the Rap1 signaling pathway. Finally, the breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance 1 (
conclusionsIn brief, we efficiently identified those crucial modules highly related to lapatinib sensitivity in GC by using a topological network method. BCAR1 was identified as a potentially critical gene that plays a role in lapatinib sensitivity, and experiments confirmed that BCAR1 might contribute to lapatinib resistance in GC. These results provide further insight into the molecular basis of lapatinib sensitivity and may offer novel strategies for the future treatment of GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.