ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Clinical features and prognostic factors in 190 cancer patients with brain metastases.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic immune-inflammation index as a prognostic biomarker to predict overall survival after primary stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastases significantly reduce the survival of cancer patients. However, detailed researches on the clinical manifestations and prognoses of patients with brain metastases are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of cancer patients with brain metastases.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with brain metastases who were treated in our hospital between January 2014 and January 2019. Comparison of overall survival (OS) was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression models was used to identify prognostic factors for OS.
resultsA total of 190 patients with complete data and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2 were enrolled. Patients with brain metastases from different primary sites had significantly different survival time (P=0.001). Patients who had a longer survival time included female patients (47.4%) (34
conclusionsFemale, younger patients with ≤3 brain metastases predicted a better survival. To improve the poor outcomes of these patients, it is necessary to find clinically significant genetic abnormalities and administer the small molecular targeted therapy early in the course of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.