Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35117396›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2020

T stage prediction of colorectal tumor based on multiparametric functional images.

Yafang Dou, Xuefeng Tang, Yingying Liu, Zhigang Gong

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yafang Dou *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai TCM University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Xuefeng Tang *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai TCM University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yingying LiuInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Zhigang GongDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai TCM University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Shuguang Hospital · CNFudan University · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have shown radiomics parameters of functional imaging have predictive values in many diseases. This study was to investigate the value of radiomics parameters of both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting T stage of colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsImaging findings of CT and MRI (both cT1-W and T2-W) and clinical information were collected from 29 patients. A total of 330 radiomics parameters were computed from manually annotated medical images, and a lasso regression model with 10-fold cross validation was employed to predict the T stage with radiomics parameters.

resultsThe lasso regression model showed good performance with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85. A total of three parameters from MRI were used in this model, while no CT findings were included in this model. The 3 selected parameters were from first-order parameters' group, which include energy and totalenergy from both cT1-W and T2-W. These parameters indicate the magnitude of pixels in the medical images.

conclusionsThis study indicates that some radiomics parameters of functional images have predictive values in T staging of CRC. Also, MRI may be more valuable than CT based on the image findings with lasso regression.

Indexed as

Colorectal tumormultiparametric functional imagingregressionT staging

Identifiers

PMID35117396
PMCPMC8798396
OpenAlexW3008793329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.