ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Distal pancreatectomy with
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distal and Total Pancreatectomy With En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection for Pancreatic Cancer at a High-Volume Center.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Real-world short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection using the National clinical database of Japan.Surgery today · 2026Article
- [Advances in Surgical Treatment Following Conversion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Review
- Targeting the Cancer-Neuronal Crosstalk in the Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Currently Debated Topics on Vascular Resection.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic cancer frequently results in celiac artery invasion, resulting in an unresectable disease that generally has a median survival period of 6-11 months. Efforts to achieve curative resection of such tumors have been made by conducting distal pancreatectomy with
methodsThis meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the clinical efficacy of the DP-CAR treatment of unresectable tumors of the pancreatic body or tail (registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019129612). The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant retrospective studies pertaining to such treatment.
resultsOverall, 12 retrospective cohort analyses incorporating 213 total DP-CAR cases and 911 DP cases were incorporated into the present meta-analysis. Pooled analyses demonstrated that relative to DP, DP-CAR was related to a longer operative duration [mean difference (MD) -73.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): -112.99 to -34.38, P=0.0002] and higher blood transfusion rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.87; P=0.03]. DP-CAR was also linked to increased rates of PV resection (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.39; P<0.001) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.93, P=0.03). In contrast, R0 resection rates were higher in the DP group (OR 2.79, 95% CI: 1.90 to 4.09, P<0.001), and these patients also had a significantly improved prognosis (median survival time, 27.0
conclusionsThis analysis indicates that DP-CAR is not an effective means of improving R0 rates. However, available studies suggest that it is nonetheless a potentially valuable treatment option for pancreatic cancer patients with celiac axis involvement, and it is associated with a reasonable median survival duration of 17.7 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.