ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Identification and validation of potential novel prognostic biomarkers for patients with glioma based on a gene co-expression network.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sox8: a multifaceted transcription factor in development and disease.Biology open · 2025Review
- Functional profiling of murine glioma models highlights targetable immune evasion phenotypes.Acta neuropathologica · 2024Article
- Non-conducting functions of potassium channels in cancer and neurological disease.Current topics in membranes · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioma is widely regarded as one of most lethal and challenging diseases of the nervous system. The aim of this study was to identify novel biomarkers that offer better prognosis prediction for Chinese patients with glioma.
methodsBy using systematic approaches, the co-expression modules were identified from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database through weighted gene co-expression network analysis and functional enrichment of essential modules of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms. The co-expression modules were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas database and the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network.
resultsFor network construction, 5,374 among 21,494 genes were selected, and an increasing genetic variance was associated with the prognosis of glioma. By using functional enrichment analysis, the involvement of multiple vital processes, including metabolism of fatty acids, was correlated with the patient prognosis. Notably, five hub genes (KCNB1, UST, SOX8, KLHL42, and HDAC4) were identified for these processes. Accordingly, using the Kaplan-Meier method, there was enhanced expression of these genes in patients with significantly lower overall survival rates, especially those from the CGGA database.
conclusionsThis study not only revealed the essential co-expression gene modules in patients with glioma, but it also unraveled the potential signaling pathways underlying these functional processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.