ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
The incidence and risk factors of acute radiation-induced dermatitis in gynecologic malignancies treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding radiation dermatitis among radiotherapy patients across Shanxi: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advantages of IMRT optimization with MCO compared to IMRT optimization without MCO in reducing small bowel high dose index for cervical cancer patients-individualized treatment options.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the incidence of and potential risk factors for acute radiation-induced dermatitis (RID) in patients with gynaecological malignancies who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
methodsNinety-six patients, who were diagnosed with gynaecological malignancies and underwent IMRT in the lower vagina and/or groin at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) between January 2012 and June 2014, were enrolled. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Acute RID grade ≥2 severity was defined as clinically relevant acute RID and sub-grouped accordingly. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
resultsThe incidence of grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 acute RID was 2.1%, 43.8%, 35.4%, 18.8%, and 0%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that clinically relevant acute RID was independently correlated with hyperglycaemia (defined as venous fasting blood glucose level ≥7.1 mmol/L for 2 consecutive measurements), concurrent chemotherapy, and prophylactic use of triethanolamine emulsion (P<0.05). Patient age (P=0.521), body mass index (BMI) (P=0.893), and radiation boost (P=0.870) were not statistically significant factors. All variables with P<0.1 were included in the multivariate analysis together with radiation boost. Similarly, clinically relevant acute RID was independently correlated with hyperglycaemia [odds ratio (OR) 3.150; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.019-9.736; P=0.046], synchronous chemotherapy (OR 3.515; 95% CI, 1.362-9.072; P=0.009), and prophylactic use of triethanolamine emulsion (OR 0.412; 95% CI, 0.170-0.998; P=0.049).
conclusionsHyperglycaemia and synchronous chemotherapy were independent predictive factors for clinically relevant acute RID. Prophylactic use of triethanolamine emulsion may help to reduce the incidence of clinically relevant acute RID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.