Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35117214›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2020

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of younger patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Penghui Niu, Lulu Zhao, Rui Ling, Dongbing Zhao, Yingtai Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Population-Based Study of Gastric Cancer Survival and Associations in Rural Western Honduras.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in young patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the Spanish AGAMENON-SEOM registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Penghui Niu *National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lulu Zhao *National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Rui Ling *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Dongbing ZhaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yingtai ChenNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGeorgetown University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival outcomes of gastric cancer in younger patients have been reported in several studies with controversial results. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes between younger and older patients.

methodsWe systematically reviewed clinical researches from PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of science published up to December 2019. The effect size for the included studies was estimated with the odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was investigated using the χ

resultsA total of 25 clinical studies involving 81,188 gastric cancer patients were included in this meta-analysis, of which one was a prospective study. Younger patients were more likely to be females, pTNM stage IV and peritoneal metastasis. The incidence of postoperative complications, lymph node metastasis, as well as hepatic metastasis of younger patients was significantly lower than that of the older. There was no statistical difference in overall survival (OS) between the younger and older patients with gastric cancer. After stratification for patients with gastrectomy, however, younger patients were associated with a better 5-year OS relative to older patients.

conclusionsIn conclusion, younger patients with gastric cancer were more often diagnosed as poorly differentiation and later pTNM tumor stage. However, younger cancer patients following gastrectomy had a better OS rate than patients in older group. Future large-scale analyses are expected to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

clinicopathological characteristicsGastric cancermeta-analysissurvival outcomesyounger adult

Identifiers

PMID35117214
PMCPMC8797321
OpenAlexW3085740693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.