ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Lymph node ratio predicts prognosis in patients with surgically resected invasive pancreatic cystic neoplasms.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic analysis of stage IIIC1p cervical cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Narrative review of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of a true precancerous lesion.Gland surgery · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn current days, the prevalence of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) is on the rise. Lymph node ratio (LNR) has emerged as a promising prognostic factor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the prognostic value of LNR in patients with invasive PCN remains unknown.
methodsWe used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to retrieve the baseline characteristics and clinical tumor variables of patients diagnosed with PCN between 1988 and 2014. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with patient prognosis.
resultsA total of 10,656 PCN cases were initially identified. Based on our exclusion criteria, our analyses included data from 1246 cases, of which 479 were patients with lymph node involvement. Patients with high LNR had shorter overall survival (OS) than patients with low LNR (median OS, 13
conclusionsOur findings suggest that LNR is a reliable, independent prognostic factor in patients with invasive PCN, strongly associated with OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS). LNR may represent a promising prognostic factor alternative to the AJCC (the American Joint Committee on Cancer) N stage in patients with node-positive PCN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.