ArticleTranslational cancer research2020
Long-term treatment results and prognostic factors of synchronous and metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck and esophagus.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose was to investigate the prognosis of patients with synchronous and metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) and esophagus (ESCC), and to evaluate the prognostic factors of these patients.
methodsA retrospective review was performed on 70 patients with synchronous and metachronous HNSCC and ESCC treated in our institution from January 2005 to December 2016. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and determine the prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes.
resultsThe 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 77.1%, 57.1% and 37.1% with the median survival time for 33.5 months. The univariate analysis results revealed that the patients with early-stage of ESCC, metachronous cancer, and receiving surgery for both cancer had better OS (P=0.003; P=0.035; P=0.002). The multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage of ESCC and receiving surgery for both cancer or not were the independent prognostic factors for OS.
conclusionsThe multidisciplinary treatment outcome is acceptable, especially for patients with early clinical stage ESCC and with chance to receiving surgery for both cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.