ArticleTranslational cancer research2019
An observational study of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI beyond progression: the association with
Article in Translational cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of bevacizumab on clinical outcomes and its comparison with standard chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Expression of biogenesis of ribosomes BRX1 is associated with malignant progression and prognosis in colorectal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Ramucirumab in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a narrative review of literature from clinical trials.Translational cancer research · 2020Review
- Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor C in renal cell carcinoma and its correlation with pathological parameters and prognosis.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe BRiTE and ARIES studies suggested that the continued use of bevacizumab beyond progression (BBP) was beneficial. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFis) bevacizumab and aflibercept as second-line treatments for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed following the application of bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy as a first-line treatment.
methodsThis observational cohort study (OCS) analyzed the medical records of 73 patients with mCRC divided into a no-VEGFi group (n=48) and a VEGFi group (n=25). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint, and the overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were secondary endpoints.
resultsThe results revealed that the PFS, ORR, and DCR of the VEGFi group were significantly superior to those of the no-VEGFi group, even in those with wild-type and mutant-type
conclusionsThese results support the use of VEGFi as a second-line treatment after bevacizumab beyond the initial progression in this OCS. Bevacizumab or aflibercept combined with second-line chemotherapy in mCRC has an acceptable safety profile and is relatively active. Regardless of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.