ArticleTranslational cancer research2019
Transcatheter embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with epirubicin-loaded DC beads in Chinese patients.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Transarterial Chemoembolization with Epirubicin-Loaded Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study (STOPPER Trial).Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Trial
- Circulating tumor DNA as a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker during interventional therapy of unresectable primary liver cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transcatheter chemoembolization with drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and compared it to the conventional TACE (cTACE) therapy method for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Chinese patients.
methodsSeventy-four patients were treated with DEB-TACE using the DC bead, and 80 patients were treated with cTACE for HCC. The modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) criteria were used to evaluate clinical response, with adverse events assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
resultsPost-TACE, 9 patients (12.2%) achieved complete response (CR) and 44 (59.5%) achieved partial response (PR), with an overall tumor response rate (ORR) of 71.6% in the DEB-TACE group. Twelve patients (15%) achieved CR, and 38 (47.5%) achieved PR, with an ORR of 62.5% in the cTACE group. However, there was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (P=0.229). Univariate logistic regression analysis determined that more than 3 nodules, higher Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage, portal vein invasion, previous chemotherapy (cTACE), and previous surgery were correlated with a worse ORR. Most common adverse events were not severe.
conclusionsDEB-TACE by DC bead was efficient and well-tolerated compared to cTACE in Chinese HCC patients. However, the present study showed no significant difference in ORR between the DEB-TACE and cTACE in the patient group with HCC. The BCLC stage, number of nodules, portal vein invasion, cTACE, and surgery history could possibly be a predictive factor for HCC treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.