ArticleTranslational cancer research2019
Diagnosis status and pathological diagnosis derived treatment of elderly lung cancer patients over 75 years old.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunotherapy for Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Stereotactic body radiotherapy for elderly patients (≥ 75 years) with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of lung cancer in the elderly is increasing. However, a disturbing number of elderly patients failed to get pathological diagnosis and therapeutic outcomes are worse than the young. This study is conducted to explore the diagnosis and treatment status of lung cancer in patients over 75 years old.
methodsPatients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2010 and October 30, 2017 were continuously screened. The pathological diagnosis must be based on the cytology or histology diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis must be built on both typical imaging features and increased tumor markers. Clinical features and survival information were obtained and analyzed.
resultsA total of 338 primary lung cancer inpatients were finally included with an age of 78.02±2.94 years. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease; 290 of all these patients were pathologically diagnosed while the other 48 patients only got a clinical diagnosis. Among the pathological diagnosis, adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma and small cell lung cancer counted for 91.72%. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) detection was performed in 126 patients and 41 of them were sensitive mutated. Among all included patients, 150 were treated by the best supportive treatment (BST). Anti-cancer treatment is significantly associated with better survival than BST (P<0.001). Definite sensitive mutation is associated with improved survival than undetected patients in EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment patients (P=0.039).
conclusionsPathological diagnosis of lung cancer in elderly patients is relatively deficient. Pathologic and molecular pathological diagnosis derived anti-cancer treatment is effective in improving survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.