ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Endorectal balloon (ERB) in helical tomotherapy (HT) for localized prostate cancer: a case report of dosimetric analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical utility of endorectal balloons in prostate cancer external beam radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiation oncology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer yields oncological outcomes similar to those following radical prostatectomy, but is associated with more anorectal toxicity. An endorectal balloon (ERB) has been utilized to decrease the incidental dose to the rectal wall. However, few studies analyzed whether the ERB can further spare the rectum in helical tomotherapy (HT), which by itself can be used to treat prostate cancer while minimizing irradiation of surrounding critical tissues. Here, we report a 64-year-old man with pathologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma (stage T2cN0M0). He underwent definitive RT using HT with a hypofractionated scheme of 70 Gy in 28 fractions. Simulation CT was performed twice: with and without ERB application. The ERB was filled with 70 mL of air. Two intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans were generated for each CT image set (with and without ERB) and compared about the dose to the anorectum. The rectal volume receiving ≥40 Gy (V40Gy) was reduced from 43.4% to 34.6% with ERB use (20.3% reduction). This reduction rate increased continuously up to V70Gy (48.2% reduction). The anal volume reduction was approximately 50% from V5Gy to V15Gy. The patient tolerated all ERB insertions well and there were no severe acute toxicities. ERB had a further anorectal-sparing effect in this case of prostate cancer treated by highly conformal HT, beyond the generally recommended dose-volume constraints of hypofractionated IMRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.