ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Effects of interleukin-2 concentration and administration method on proliferation and function of cytokine-induced killer cells.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) adoptive cell transfer (ACT) is a common malignant tumor treatment method. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is one of the essential cytokines for CIKs cultures. In different phase of CIKs (quiescent and exponential growth), due to different active states and IL-2R expression of the CIKs surface, different doses of IL-2 are required. However, most studies, only addressed the effects of IL-2 concentrations on the function of CIKs, and the differences between varied administration methods of IL-2 have not been explored.
methodsThis study established a novel sequential administration methods for IL-2. Different concentrations of IL-2 were added during different CIKs induction phases. Then, the proliferation ability of CIKs was evaluated using cell proliferation curves. The immune phenotype was analyzed by flow cytometry (FCM), and IFN-γ secretion ability and cytotoxicity were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits and cell counting kit-8, respectively. Multiple comparisons were conducted between each group to compare the function of CIKs in 12 experimental groups.
resultsAs the IL-2 concentration increased, the number of CIKs continued to increase in each group, but the function of CIKs was not positively related to its number: CD3+ CD56+ subpopulation ratio, INF-γ secretion ability, and cytotoxicity showed irregular changes. During the quiescent and exponential growth phases, adding 300 and 1,000 U/mL IL-2 respectively achieved powerful CIKs (cell numbers of day 16: (384.37±2.05)×10
conclusionsDifferent concentrations of IL-2 had a greater influence on the biological function of CIKs in different growth phases, and it is better to add IL-2 sequentially during the quiescent and exponential growth phases of CIKs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.