ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced CT for residual and new lesions after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with primary liver cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A controlled study of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI compared with enhanced CT in assessing lesion status after TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Efficacy and Safety of transarterial chemoembolization Combined with Targeted Therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of AFP-L3 and Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin in advanced primary liver cancer treated with Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Clinical Significance of Liver MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023Review
- Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.World journal of hepatology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization combined with apatinib on rabbit VX2 liver tumors by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for residual and new lesions after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with primary liver cancer (PHC).
methodsSeventy-two PHC patients admitted to Linyi Central Hospital from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected as the study subjects, with a total of 92 lesions. All patients were treated with TACE, and were followed up at 6 months postoperatively. In addition, all patients underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and with DSA results serving as the gold standard for diagnosis, the efficacy and accuracy of MRI and CECT for residual and new lesions after TACE in PHC patients were evaluated.
resultsThere were no significant differences in the specificity between the two diagnostic methods (P>0.05), and the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of MRI were markedly higher than those of CECT (P<0.05). The number of residual and new lesions diagnosed by MRI was notably higher than that by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) (P<0.05), and the detection rate of residual and new lesions after TACE in PHC patients with different types of iodized oil deposition by MRI was significantly higher than that by CECT (P<0.05). Also, the number of postoperative tumor capsules diagnosed by MRI was considerably higher than that by CECT (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two diagnostic methods in the score of residual enhancement appearances in the arterial phase after surgery (P>0.05). Furthermore, there were no notable differences between the two diagnostic methods in the diagnosis of portal vein tumorous emboli and the source of blood supply to lesions after surgery (P>0.05).
conclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of MRI for residual and new lesions after TACE in PHC patients were higher than those of CECT. However, these two diagnostic methods were similar in diagnosing portal vein tumorous emboli, the source of blood supply to lesions, and the score of residual enhancement appearances in the arterial phase after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.