ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Long term survival of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-Analysis on the Long-Term Impact of Cytoreductive Surgery Plus HIPEC for Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis: Are We on the Right Path?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Updated Meta-Analysis on Long-Term Outcomes Following Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Secondary cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer- experience from a tertiary care centre in India.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Defining the Values and Quality of Life of Cancer Survivors Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: An International Survey Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the efficacy of conventional debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with the peritoneal metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOCPC).
methodsIn patients with ovarian cancer who underwent surgery-based multidisciplinary treatment at our center from May 2004 to November 2019, 186 EOCPC patients were divided into a control group (conventional debulking surgery, n=115) and a study group (CRS+HIPEC, n=71) and were matched for baseline characteristics by propensity score matching (PSM). The endpoints were median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS).
resultsAfter matching, 133 patients met the selection criteria, including 80 patients in the control group and 53 patients in the study group. The mOS in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group (87.3
conclusionsStandardized CRS+HIPEC can contribute significant survival benefits to patients with EOCPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.