ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Efficacy of preoperative brachytherapy for controlling vaginal bleeding in early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn our clinical study, 11% of the patients with early-stage cervical cancers had different degrees of vaginal bleeding, which required a preoperative intervention. We set to assess the efficacy and safety of preoperative high-dose rate vaginal ovoid brachytherapy (HDR-VOBT) for the treatment of vaginal bleeding in women with early cervical cancer.
methodsWe retrospectively identified and reviewed patients with vaginal bleeding and early-stage cervical carcinoma, treated between January 2011 and December 2014 (median follow-up of 69 months). Of the 116 patients, 59 received preoperative HDR-VOBT (a dose of 8 Gy at 0.5 cm from the tumor surface), and 57 received traditional vaginal packing with gauze alone, followed by radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Analysis of the clinical parameters was performed using the chi-square test. The outcome measures were the 3- and 5-year survival and the complication rate.
resultsFrom the 116 patients, 25 had stage IB1, 49 had stage IB2, and 42 had stage IIA1 cervical cancer. No differences were observed regarding the 5-year overall survival (OS) (91.5%
conclusionsPreoperative HDR-VOBT with a dose of 8 Gy at 0.5 cm from the surface of the tumor has a better hemostatic effect than vaginal packing with gauze, with no additional complications and no need for adjuvant treatment after the operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.