ReviewTranslational cancer research2021
Application of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy in the early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraprocedural O-arm computed tomography-guided navigation with ventilatory strategy for atelectasis electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions: an IDEAL stage 2a study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Guided Technologies Combined With Ultrathin Bronchoscopic Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.The clinical respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Preoperative localization of pulmonary nodules by electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with methylene blue injection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Issues and prospects of image-guided thermal ablation in the treatment of primary and metastatic lung tumors.Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of lung cancer has long been a problem facing clinicians worldwide, and the emergence of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) has played a critical role in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Compared with other types of biopsy techniques (e.g., transthoracic needle biopsy, bronchoscopy, thoracoscopic biopsy, and thoracotomy), ENB guarantees high diagnostic accuracy and safety. In recent years, with the continuous development of ENB technology, the scope of its epitaxy has also expanded. This technology is no longer a simple auxiliary diagnosis test but an innovative technology that simultaneously assists in surgical treatment, opening new avenues of research for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. However, ENB, as a human-mediated operating system, has some limitations and uncertainties in its actual clinical application and promotion, which need to be addressed as we continue to develop ENB technology. In response to the bottleneck in developing ENB technology in current clinical diagnosis and treatment, relevant scientific research and development personnel and clinicians have also performed continuing exploration and improvement of methods. However, to completely overcome the limitations of ENB, more technological innovations are needed. In this review, we describe the current major clinical application directions, application advantages, and limitations of ENB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.