ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Metastatic adenocarcinoma to the breast from the lung simulates primary breast carcinoma-a clinicopathologic study.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRare extra-mammary metastases of adenocarcinoma to the breast closely mimic primary invasive breast carcinoma (PBC), and specifically without an aware of clinical history, pose a difficult diagnostic issue.
methodsWith the aim to improve differential diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma metastasis and primary breast carcinoma in the breast, we retrieved 41 breast metastases from lung adenocarcinoma, seven of which were from the archived pathologic files of Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (CHCAMS) between 2001 and 2019, and the other 34 cases were collected from the published literatures. Clinicopathological features were collected and analyzed for differential diagnosis of primary lung malignancy, triple negative breast pathology and breast lesions without ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy or with contralateral axillary lymphadenopathy. Supplementary breast (GCDFP-15, or GATA-3) and lung-lineage (TTF-1) immunostaining plus genetic alternation analysis were also recorded and analyzed.
resultsAmong the 41 cases, there were 37 females and four males, with a median age of 63 (range, 40-81) years at diagnosis of the breast lesion. Twenty-four cases (58.5%, 24/41) were detected metachronously to the counterpart of the lung. Strikingly, 13 cases (31.7%, 13/41) were initially misdiagnosed as primary breast cancer, and differential diagnostic factors were compared and analyzed between the correct and misdiagnosed cases, among which a documentation of lung cancer history showed significant difference. Pathologist initially misinterpreted six cases (46.2%, 6/13) as PBC on needle biopsy of breast mass with an unknown lung cancer history. The clinical diagnosis was considered two cases (15.4%, 2/13) to be either a primary breast tumor with lung and pleural metastasis or two synchronous primary tumors. Three cases (23.1%, 3/13) were initially misinterpreted as PBC by breast ultrasonography. TTF-1 immunostaining was found to be critical for a correct diagnosis of metastatic lesion (84.6%, 11/13) from the initially misdiagnosed cases as PBC.
conclusionsMetastatic lung adenocarcinoma to the breast, although rare, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of primary breast carcinoma, especially when the breast lesion exhibits as a "triple-negative invasive carcinoma". A documented lung cancer history combined with the clinicoradiological assessment and pathological evaluation are essential to make a correct differential diagnosis. TTF-1 immunostaining is crucial in approaching the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.