ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Diagnosis and follow-up value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe lesion of primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PGL) originates from the submucosa, so conventional gastroscopy has limited diagnostic potential. This study evaluated the diagnosis and follow-up value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in PGL.
methodsSeventy-nine patients diagnosed with PGL either by EUS and biopsy pathology or by postoperative pathology were included in the study. All subjects underwent EUS with deep targeted biopsy and regular follow-up.
resultsWe found sensitivity and specificity of EUS combined with deep targeted biopsy for PGL as 87.3% (69/79) and 80.0% (20/25) respectively, and the diagnostic accuracy as 85.6% (89/104). EUS combined with deep targeted biopsy had significantly greater diagnostic accuracy than gastroscopy [85.6% (89/104)
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that EUS combined with deep targeted biopsy was associated with increased detection of Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (PGL), in terms of depth and extent of the lesion to guide treatment selection and to evaluate treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.