ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
New prognostic models for extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type using Cox regression and machine learning.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Immune-Mediated IgA Nephropathy Induced by PD-1 Blockade in Extranodal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in the histopathology of lymphoma: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- A Nomogram Model Based on the Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score (IINS) and Classic Clinical Indicators for Predicting Prognosis in Extranodal Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Minimal residual disease detection in lymphoma: methods, procedures and clinical significance.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Integrative Prognostic Machine Learning Models in Mantle Cell Lymphoma.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Application of machine learning in the management of lymphoma: Current practice and future prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic index of natural killer lymphoma (PINK) is recommended for use as a prognostic model for determining the best non-anthracycline-based treatment for extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type (ENKTL). However, this model does not provide an accurate individual risk estimation for patients; therefore, our retrospective study was conducted to determine this risk.
methodsClinical data from 250 patients with ENKTL treated with non-anthracycline-based regimens were analyzed. The statistically significant clinical characteristics were selected as the parameters for our models. The patient data from 250 patients were randomly divided into 5 groups for 5-fold cross validation before final models were established on all of the patients' data. A statistical model nomogram based on a Cox proportional hazards model, and a machine learning model based on the lightGBM algorithm, were constructed. Concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve, areas under the curve (AUC) values, and binary error were used to evaluate two models.
resultsFive variables [age, the Chinese Southwest Oncology Group and Asia Lymphoma Study Group ENKTL (CA) staging system, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, B symptoms, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)] were significant and were selected as parameters for creating the statistical model nomogram, while lesion sites (anatomical regions, lymph nodes and primary lesion site) took place of CA staging system in machine learning model. During cross validation, the mean C-indices of training cohort and validation cohort for statistical model nomogram and PINK were 0.851±0.008, 0.843±0.029, 0.758±0.019 and 0.757±0.080, respectively, while the mean 3-year AUC for machine learning model were 0.920±0.010 and 0.865±0.035, respectively. The calibration curves and binary errors showed a good correlation between the predicted result and the reality.
conclusionsThese two models could provide ENKTL patients with an accurate individual risk estimation in the era of non-anthracycline-based treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.