Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116390›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2021

Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial.

Xuehua Zhang, Gaohua Li, Xiaojing Li, Zhenye Liang, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Zhenzhao Xu, Jie Fu, Mingyi Wu, Guoxin Li and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04268290 (Effect of Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04268290 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Surgery Assistant Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Colorectal Cancer : A Single Arm Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsSingle incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Clinical Practice and Quality Control Strategies for Complex Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xuehua Zhang *Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gaohua Li *Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaojing Li *The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenye LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoliang LanDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingyu MouDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenzhao XuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie FuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingyi WuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoxin LiDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanan WangDepartment of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have proved that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol can significantly improve the recovery course of patients during the perioperative period. The application of minimally invasive surgery is a critical component of ERAS protocol. Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS plus one) could achieve further minimally invasive surgical results than conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of SILS plus one with ERAS protocol in colorectal cancer.

methodsThis is a prospective, single-center, open-label, single-arm trial. A total of 120 eligible patients with colorectal cancer will receive SILS plus one followed by the ERAS management during the perioperative period. The primary endpoint is postoperative hospital stay. The secondary endpoints include rehabilitative rate of the fourth postoperative day, postoperative medical cost, postoperative pain score, postoperative recovery indexes, inflammatory immune response indexes, compliance with ERAS measures, 6 min postoperative walking test (6MWT), hospital readmissions, and early postoperative complications. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILS plus one assisted with ERAS protocol for patients with colorectal cancer and will provide valuable clinical evidence on the benefit of the combination of these two techniques, hopefully, to provide patients with more safe, economic, feasible, and rapid surgery and perioperative strategies.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry, NCT0426829. Registered February 15, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04268290).

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerenhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)laparoscopic surgerysingle-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS plus one)study protocol

Identifiers

PMID35116390
PMCPMC8799928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.