Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116386›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2021

Antitumor activity of fucoidan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ling-Min Cao, Zao-Xi Sun, Emmanuel Costantine Makale, Guan-Kui Du, Wen-Fang Long, Hai-Rong Huang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Perspectives for the Use of Fucoidans in Clinical Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling-Min Cao *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Zao-Xi Sun *Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, National Clinical Skills Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Emmanuel Costantine MakaleDepartment of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, National Clinical Skills Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Guan-Kui DuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Wen-Fang LongLaboratory of Tropical Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Hai-Rong HuangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Hainan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the antitumor activity of fucoidan based on the results of animal experimental studies.

methodsThe databases of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Sino Med, Wanfang, and Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals (CQVIP) were searched for randomized and controlled animal experiments on the antitumor activity of fucoidan. The search included studies published up to 31 December 2020, and there was no limit to the start date. Endnote X9 software was employed to manage and screen the literature, Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) was used for assessment of risk of bias, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.

resultsA total of 23 articles were included in the study. The results showed that compared with the control group, the fucoidan intervention group had significantly inhibited tumor weight, volume, and number. The combined effect values were mean difference (MD) =-0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.10 to -0.79; MD =-0.78, 95% CI: -1.06 to -0.50; and standardized mean difference (SMD) =-3.27, 95% CI: -4.30 to -2.23, respectively. The results of subgroup analysis showed that low-dose and intragastric administration of fucoidan had the best effect on breast cancer in controlling tumor weight, low-dose and intraperitoneal injection had the best effect on multiple myeloma in controlling tumor volume, and high-dose and intraperitoneal injection of fucoidan had the best effect on melanoma in controlling the number of tumors.

conclusionsThe existing evidence shows that fucoidan inhibits the growth and spontaneous metastasis of tumors in numerous animal models. The tumor type, dosage, and administration method have been shown to influence the effect of fucoidan, and thus its mechanism warrants further research. As the design quality of the included studies was not high, heterogeneity and bias may have affected the accuracy of the results.

Indexed as

animal tumor modelFucoidaninhibition of tumormeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35116386
PMCPMC8798841
OpenAlexW4205405775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.