Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116355›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2021

Prognostic and staging value of tumor deposits in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Tianlei Xu, Zhuo Yu, Qian Zhang, Botao Liu, Yuanxin Li, Feng Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianlei Xu *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhuo Yu *Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Botao LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yuanxin LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Tsinghua University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of tumor deposits (TDs) is only considered in the absence of lymph node metastases (LNMs) in the current TNM staging system. However, the prognostic value of TDs when concomitant with LNM for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of TDs and when concomitant with LNMs in rectal cancer after NCRT.

methodsPatients with rectal cancer who had received NCRT between 2010 and 2016 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 18 (year range, 1975-2016) database. Data were extracted on the following: age, sex, race, TNM stage, total LNs harvested, positive LNs, histologic type, perineural invasion, grade, carcinoma embryonic antigen status, TD number, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. The primary objective was to determine the prognostic impact of TDs on CSS. The effect of the addition of TD to the LNM count for a novel N stage was also evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models.

resultsOf 9,620 patients, 865 (9.0%) had TDs. TD-positive patients showed a worse prognosis than TD-negative patients (HR =2.39, 95% CI: 2.04-2.80, P<0.001), and multivariate analysis showed that the presence of TDs was an independent poor prognostic factor (HR =1.41, 95% CI: 1.19-1.67, P<0.001). Regarding the LN status, TDs were associated with a higher risk of cancer-specific death in the LNM- group (HR =2.43, 95% CI: 1.86-3.18, P<0.001), M1 group (HR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.08-2.10, P<0.001), and ypN1 group (HR =2.08, 95% CI: 1.61-2.70, P<0.001), but not in the ypN2 group (HR =0.97, 95% CI: 0.69-1.36, P=0.84). Patients with concomitant TDs and LNM showed significantly worse survival than those with TDs or LNM alone (5-year CSS: 48.2%, 72.2%, and 67.8%, respectively). The 5-year CSS rates were 86.2%, 77.4%, 65.1%, 53.8%, and 46.5% for the novel N0, N1a, N1b, N2a, and N2b groups, respectively (P<0.05 across all groups). Time dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and decision curve analysis showed that the novel N stage was superior to the current ypN stage.

conclusionsThe presence of TDs is an independent poor prognostic factor for LARC patients after NCRT. The concomitant presence of TDs and LNM indicates a significantly worse survival, and the addition of TD to LNM may help to better prompt appropriate risk stratification.

Indexed as

neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT)novel stageprognosisrectal cancerTumor deposits (TDs)

Identifiers

PMID35116355
PMCPMC8799283
OpenAlexW4205855090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.