ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
The clinical prognostic factors of patients with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nomogram predicting overall and cancer specific prognosis for poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma after resection based on SEER cohort analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Correlation of CT features of lung adenocarcinoma with sex and age.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Prognosis in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma with Atypical Solid Nodules on Thin-Section CT Images.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with stage III-N2 lung adenocarcinoma based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of stage IB non-small cell lung cancer with visceral pleural invasion.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLung adenocarcinoma (ADC) at stage IB has its own prognostic characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the clinical factors that may affect the prognosis of patients with stage IB ADC.
methodsThe data of ADC cases were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2016) and patients in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Department of Thoracic Surgery, 2015-2016). Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain the overall survival (OS). Factors that significantly related to the prognosis were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis (UVA, MVA) using the Cox model. A nomogram was developed and validated to predict the 3-year OSs of those patients.
results7,605 patients with stage IB ADC were included ultimately and were divided into two groups, a training cohort (n=5,324) and a test cohort (n=2,281). Besides, there was a validation cohort (n=272) for the verification of the nomogram model. Those with significantly older age, male, the white race, lower grades of tumor differentiation, larger tumor size (31-40 mm) without pleural layer (PL) invasion as well as receiving sublobectomy suffered from poorer survival (P<0.001), which were identified as independent factors for stage IB ADC (P<0.001), and according to which, a nomogram model was created.
conclusionsAge, sex, race, histological grade, surgery to the primary site, and tumor size combined with PL invasion were independent risk factors for stage IB ADC, based on which a nomogram was constructed to predict the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.