Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116318›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2021

Three-incision robotic major lung resection for cancer.

Kazuhiro Ueda, Tadashi Umehara, Koki Maeda, Soichi Suzuki, Naoya Yokomakura, Kota Kariatsumari, Masami Sato

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazuhiro UedaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Tadashi UmeharaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Koki MaedaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Soichi SuzukiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Naoya YokomakuraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Kota KariatsumariDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Masami SatoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Dental and Medical Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Kagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegardless of the current trend in reduced port surgery, robotic surgery generally requires multiple (≥4) skin incisions for robotic arms and patient-side surgeons. In addition, the use of multiple arms results in interreference between the arms and the patient-side surgeon. In the current study, we reviewed our initial experience of a less invasive robotic approach for lung cancer.

methodsWe used 3 arms of the Da Vinci Xi system in an original manner: the camera was set at the most ventral arm for patients and the forceps for right and left hands were set at the more dorsal arms. We made a 4-cm incision in the eighth intercostal space along the middle-axillary line for the insertion of 2 ports for a camera and forceps. This window was eventually used for the extraction of the resected lobes. In addition, we made 1-cm incision along the posterior-axillary line for the remaining arm, and a 1.5-cm incision along the anterior-axillary line for a utility window for the patient-side surgeon.

resultsOur port setting contributed to preventing interference between the 2 adjacent arms (camera and forceps), as well as to improving the performance of the patient-side surgeon who does not experience interference from the robotic arms. During the initial experiences of 39 patients, the same procedure was successfully completed by 3 different console surgeons. There were no catastrophic events during the operations or in the 90-day postoperative period, although we experienced 2 open conversions (5%) for noncritical bleeding.

conclusionsWe established a 3-incision robotic surgery for lung cancer, which in addition to being patient-friendly, may facilitates collaboration between the console-surgeon and patient-side surgeon without compromising the performance of the console surgeon.

Indexed as

Lung cancerreduced port surgeryrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35116318
PMCPMC8798239
OpenAlexW3214652173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.