ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Efficiency of C-reactive protein in prognosis evaluation of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Serum CCL2 Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Non-Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Prognostic Impact of Serum CRP Level in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTumor markers can be diagnostically suggestive and are sometimes even related to prognostic prediction certain diseases. Multiple studies have shown the effectiveness in the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) by the use of C-reactive protein (CRP). This meta-analysis was conducted to facilitate a conclusion regarding the values of CRP in the prediction of survival rate in patients with PCa.
methodsManuscripts were searched, identified, and collected from different databases; quality evaluation was performed according to the different search strategies involved. Information including the comparison between overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate were retained from different studies in patients with evaluated or lowered CRP levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) was also recorded in relation to the log of CRP. Level of relevance was assessed using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogenicity testing was performed by using Cochran's Q test and Higgins I
resultsA total 12 of manuscripts were included and evaluated from the 1,523 initially identified studies. The results of OS and PFS were 1.57 (95% CI: 1.34 to 1.85) and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.25 to 1.81), respectively. For CSS, the combined HR and 95% CI was 1.92 (95% CI: 1.36 to 2.70), which revealed a significant correlation between increased level of CRP and CSS in PCa patients.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis revealed that CRP value could be one of the critical indicators to predict the survival rate of PCa patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.