Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116292›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2021

Risk factors for postoperative pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with cervical cancer: evidences for management strategies.

Meng Li, Qing Tian

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng LiDepartment of Gynaecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qing TianKey Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt's necessary to evaluate the potential risk factors for postoperative pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in patients with cervical cancer, to provide insights into the treatment and nursing care of cervical cancer.

methodsOur study was a case-control study design. Patients who underwent radical cervical cancer surgery in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were included. We selected the patients with benign uterine lesions after hysterectomy at the same time as the control group. The patient characteristics of two groups were retrospectively compared and analyzed. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the potential risk factors.

resultsA total of 247 patients were included. The duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, duration of urinary catheter, and length of hospital stay in cervical cancer group were significantly more than that of control group (all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative PFD was 63.93%. There were significant differences in the age, postoperative constipation, number of deliveries, duration of urinary catheter between PFD and no PFD patients (all P<0.05). Age ≥45y (OR 4.39, 1.05-9.83), duration of urinary catheter ≥7d (OR 4.31, 1.22-8.05), postoperative constipation (OR 3.17, 1.07-5.89) and number of deliveries ≥2 (OR 2.75, 1.22-5.43) were the risk factors for postoperative PFD in patients with cervical cancer.

conclusionsEarly measures targeted on those risk factors should be implemented for the prophylaxis of PFD.

Indexed as

careCervical cancerincontinencepelvic floorsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35116292
PMCPMC8798382
OpenAlexW3201525589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.